Skip to content

University challenge: LSE vs. Harvard (with data!)

People who have spent time in Taiwan will tell you that Taiwanese take education very seriously. From the cram schools for grade schoolers to the cram schools for middle schoolers to, well you get the point. Everyone, it seems, is studying something. Whether you put it down to “Confucianism” or the simple fact that exams have a disproportionate influence on the trajectory of peoples’ lives, educational achievement is prime indicator of success.

Most Taiwanese politicians are highly educated. Granted, mafia types and other unsavoury characters have pitched up in the legislature (and, some would say, the Cabinet) from time to time, but generally speaking, the level of achievement is highly impressive.

I will post something on this later in the campaign about how candidates flaunt their academic credentials. For extra spice, this year’s presidential contest pits graduates of two prime education brands, Harvard and the LSE. Until I compile the data on the candidates’ mentions of their educational backgrounds, I give you a glimpse of how international print media have covered the issue.

At some point during the 2008 presidential campaign, it struck me that I couldn’t turn on CNN or open the FT without seeing “Harvard-educated” in connection with (then challenger, now incumbent) Ma Ying-jeou. To be fair, I imagine many Harvard graduates find it hard to avoid mention the greatest university in the world every now and then, and if other people want to talk about it what’s a Harvard grad to do?

So, I asked Nexis to give me major English newspaper reports that included the candidate’s name, and institution of highest degree (I checked that all the returned articles were kosher) in the three month period prior to the relevant presidential election. For 2012, I asked for the preceding three months, and these latest figures are likely to change.

Candidate Year Status




Lee Teng-hui 1996 Incumbent


Cornell (PhD)


Peng Ming-min 1996 Challenger


Paris (JSD)


Lien Chan 2000 Incum. VP


Chicago (PhD)


Chen Shui-bian 2000 Challenger


National Taiwan University (LLB)


James Soong 2000 Challenger


Georgetown (PhD)


Chen Shui-bian 2004 Incumbent


National Taiwan University (LLB)


Lien Chan 2004 Challenger


Chicago (PhD)


Frank Hsieh 2008 Incum. party


National Taiwan University (LLB)Kyoto (ABD)



Ma Ying-Jeou 2008 Challenger


Harvard (JSD)


Ma Ying-Jeou 2012 Incumbent


Harvard (JSD)


Tsai Ing-wen 2012 Challenger




Three things stand out. First, Cornell in 1996 is obviously exceptional. In the twisted logic of cross-Strait relations, Lee’s speech at his alma mater led China to launch missiles off the coast of Taiwan. Second, with the exception of Chen Shui-bian in 2000, DPP candidates’ education is not as salient as that of their KMT counterparts (don’t call conspiracy yet, because)… Third, KMT candidates (and Soong) all had graduate degrees from elite American schools, whereas DPP candidates, while respectable, can’t match their pedigree. Journalists, it seems are just as education brand conscious as many Taiwanese.

So can the LSE stack up against Harvard in the presidential campaign? Maybe it has the right touch of exoticism for Taiwanese should they be jaded from hearing too much about the greatest university in the world.

Mail me at, follow me on Twitter @jonlsullivan, or access my published and working papers at

Published inInternational PoliticsTaiwan 2012

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.